Skip to content

Spec vs Vibe Coding

Kiro offers two distinct modes for building applications. Understanding when to use each is key to getting the most out of the IDE.

Kiro showing Spec and Vibe coding mode options

Spec-driven development is Kiro’s recommended approach. When you provide a prompt in Spec mode, Kiro creates three structured documents:

  1. Requirements — User stories and acceptance criteria in EARS notation
  2. Design — Technical architecture, sequence diagrams, and implementation considerations
  3. Implementation Plan — A detailed task list with discrete, trackable tasks

Use Spec mode when you want a structured, reviewable development process.

Model selection and Autopilot mode options in Kiro

  • Model selection — You can choose from available models, though Auto is recommended. Kiro will optimise which model to use. Model selection influences both results and credit usage.
  • Autopilot mode — An autonomous execution feature where Kiro can make multiple code changes, run commands, and make architectural decisions across a codebase to complete complex tasks with minimal human intervention.

Kiro now supports open weight models in addition to Claude. These models offer different strengths and credit costs:

ModelCredit MultiplierBest For
DeepSeek v3.20.25xAgentic workflows, multi-step tool calling, maintaining state across long sessions
MiniMax 2.10.15xMultilingual programming (Rust, Java, Go, C++, Kotlin, TypeScript), UI generation
Qwen3 Coder Next0.05xLong agentic CLI sessions, 256K context support, budget-friendly coding

When to use open weight models:

  • Quick iterations and boilerplate — Use Qwen3 Coder Next (0.05x) for routine tasks
  • Complex debugging — DeepSeek v3.2 excels at maintaining context across debugging sessions
  • Frontend development — MiniMax 2.1 is strong at generating web, Android, and iOS UI code